Dear Friends, Please read and forward this important press
release on to other networkers and media contacts. Thank you very much!
Sincerely yours,Jerry Lynn, PR Assistant, TPG
Tetrahedron Publishing Group
Health Science Communications for People Around the World
206 North 4th Avenue, Suite 147
Sandpoint, ID 83864 ۰
FAX:
NEWS RELEASE
Release: No. DITA-176
Date Mailed: March 12, 2002
For Immediate Release
Contact: Jerry Lynn-208/265-2575; 888/508-4787
Opposition to "Star Wars" Program Mounts:
"Space Preservation Act of 2002" Gains Support on Capitol Hill and Grassroots
Sandpoint, ID - Opposition is mounting on Capitol Hill, and in the grassroots,
to the costly and risky Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), better known as
"Star Wars"-a cornerstone of the Bush administration's military mindset.
Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) has advanced legislation that targets
the SDI, alternatively called National Missile Defense (NMD), in response to
public health and safety concerns.
The new bill, the "Space Preservation Act of 2002" (H.R. 3616), proposes to
ban space-based weapons and terminate "research, development, testing,
manufacturing, production and deployment of all space-based weapons of the
United States." The term "space-based weapon" is defined as "a device capable of
damaging or destroying an object or person (whether in outer space, in the
atmosphere, or on earth) . . ." including firing projectiles, detonating
explosives, or directing energy sources at objects or people.
Thus far, according to Dr. Carol Rosin, President of the Institute for
Cooperation in Space, most of the world's nations are on record as wanting to
ban space-based weapons. On November 29, 2001, the U.N. General Assembly
approved by 156-0 votes the basis for a treaty establishing a permanent ban on
space-based weapons (Resolution 56/535).
Grass roots activism is spreading rapidly in support of this bill according
to Dr. Rosin, who Military Space reported was "the original political architect
of the move to stop the SDI and ASATs (anti-satellite weapons)." Two decades of
experience as a government watchdog and policy analyst in this field has taught
her this bill may be "critical for assuring the public's health and safety."
"The weaponization of space will be prevented with passing H.R. 3616, and the
compatible Space Preservation Treaty. We can then safely establish a world
cooperative space R&D program for health, education, security and economic
growth based on space exploration, space habitation, space hospitals, space
industry and commerce," Dr. Rosin said. "Even space schools, labs, farms, hotels
and resorts in space are being planned for the near future."
Many scientists and space industrialists advocate passage of H.R. 3616,
for example, to facilitate research and development. For example, many health
scientists believe new healing techniques might be developed in zero gravity.
Others advocate space developments in pursuit of safer and cleaner technologies
used to solve urgent human problems including worsening environmental pollution.
The pending legislation, H.R. 3616, calls for a ban on all space-based
weapons. The broadly defined term "weapons" in the definition section of an
earlier version of the legislation as introduced into the Congressional Record
included-"(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems; (iv) plasma,
electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons; (v) laser weapons systems; (vi)
strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and (vii) chemical,
biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons." H.R. 3616 maintains
the clear intent to ban all space-based weapons, no matter what they may be.
Reflecting growing grassroots concern, one small press has donated $30,000
worth of books entitled "Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic
Warfare" (ISBN: ) to members of Congress and American libraries in
support of the bill. The book, written by Harvard-trained health science
investigator, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, discusses the risks posed by the SDI and
failure to pass H.R. 3616. (See