The following press release and attached letters document the premeditated attack by Clifford Kincaid-a self-proclaimed "anti-communist," and Director of the Committee to Protect Medical Freedom--against Dr. Leonard Horowitz and WorldNetDaily.com, published by Joseph Farah, that began August 20, 2001. NEWS RELEASE Release: No.39-Kincaid/1 Date Mailed: August 24, 2001 For Immediate Release Contact: Jackie Lindenbach-208/265-2575; 800/336-9266 Dr. Len Horowitz Responds to Anticommunist Right Winger Clifford Kincaid: Award Winning Author and WorldNetDaily Prejudicially Attacked Sandpoint, ID - If you are among the dozens of desperate and disappointed people who have tried in vain to gain lifesaving advice for cancer, autoimmune diseases, and vaccine injuries from Dr. Len Horowitz this week, you can thank Mr. Clifford Kincaid, Director of the Committee to Protect Medical Freedom, for the doctor's inaccessibility. This self-proclaimed "anticommunist" managed to cage the doctor, monopolizing his time and knowledge, in an unprecedented and premeditated attack on the award winning author, and the WorldNetDaily news company. At issue is the publication and distribution of the American best-seller, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola-Nature, Accident or Intentional? (Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 1998), a book Mr. Kincaid calls "Russian propaganda." It contains National Institutes of Health (NIH) contracts from 1971, showing numerous HIV/AIDS-like viruses were bioengineered by a top U.S. Army biological weapons contractor-Litton Bionetics. The book's certified documents prove this took place more than a decade before the official "discovery" of HIV, and years before scientists generally believe such biotechnology existed. Mr. Kincaid holds that one of dozens of reprinted documents is a "forgery" and communist conspiracy. In a detailed, courteous, and compliant response to Mr. Kincaid's lengthy initial interrogation letter, Dr. Horowitz replied, point-by-point, to the McCarthyist's charges. This, however, did not stop Kincaid's planned condemnation of the doctor and Joseph Farah's WorldNetDaily-the Internet's most successful independent news source wherein Dr. Horowitz's books and tapes are often discussed and offered. (See WorldNetDaily.com.) Mr. Kincaid's correspondence ensnared the author in a smear campaign in which Kincaid heralded over the Internet, "Author Caught Promoting Soviet AIDS Disinformation in Book . . . Leonard Horowitz Duped on Forgery; Willing to Collaborate with Farrakhan, Gadhafi." (See: http://www.protectmedicalfreedom.com/ck8222k1.shtml and http://www.tetrahedron.org/) Hurling dozens of offbeat and abusive allegations, including prose designed to "expose" the author as an alleged communist sympathizer, Mr. Kincaid issued his press release. He blasted the Harvard trained public health authority, who recently returned from a humanitarian tour of Central Africa, for the doctor's willingness to address any audience, including Nation of Islam leader, Minister Louis Farrakhan. Libyan President Moammar Gadhafi, with whom Dr. Horowitz has had no communication whatsoever, was selected by Mr. Kincaid, simply for his smear value and close relationship with Minister Farrakhan. Why AIDS disproportionately affects minority populations is a question, asked by scientists and world leaders alike, that is largely answered by the official documents in Dr. Horowitz's books. His latest publication, Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare (Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 2001), contains one document, among dozens, that Mr. Kincaid argues is a Russian "forgery." In total, these documents evidence a long history of Anglo-American directed genocide against native and minority populations. In what amounts to McCarthy era tactics, Mr. Kincaid condemned Dr. Horowitz's dialogue, particularly with Third World leaders, on such topics that he says are "un-American." "I believe genocide is 'un-American,'" Dr. Horowitz replied. "The global industrialists conducting these mostly covert biotoxic operations care little about America, but a lot about their profits. Genocide is simply defined as 'the mass killing of people for economic, political, or ideological reasons.' The published documents, along with a sixteen-page full color gallery of the oligarchy's 'art' in my latest book, proves genocide is precisely occurring, both in the United States as well as in lessor developed nations." Twisting the doctor's written reply, Mr. Kincaid wrote mostly concerning a document circulated by either American or Russian intelligence agencies that, in either case, detailed the precise measures taken against African American and Black African organizations by U.S. Government officials and agencies. Falsely patronizing the doctor he wrote, "It is a step forward that you admit being taken in by an almost 20-year-old hoax and forgery." He further stated, "You are on the road to being totally discredited, . . . " and that Dr. Horowitz's research, which has won him awards and international support within scientific and activist circles, was "sloppy . . . wild . . . and unsubstantiated." "Obviously, Mr. Kincaid is making a name for himself by unjustly targeting me and the esteemed American journalist, Joseph Farah, publisher of WorldNetDaily," Dr. Horowitz said. For this he told Mr. Kincaid that "your deliberate avoidance of these critical documents speaks volumes about the fact you are neither a scientist, or even a respectable journalist, but a fool with anticommunist flair, . . . . The manner in which you distorted my words, to suit your political agenda, regarding the alleged NSM-46 'forgery' is despicable, and apparently reflects either psychopathology (lunacy) or vengeance on your part. In either case, you make it clear by your accusations; you have no interest in fair, and productive dialogue. "Indeed," the doctor continued, "my works all speak for themselves with evidentiary documents reprinted. You'd have to be a complete fool to challenge my integrity as humanitarian and investigative journalist. And that is apparently what you are." It is not unusual for Dr. Horowitz to be smeared this way by far right and far left individuals and organizations. A few years ago, the John Birch Society alleged in their New American, that Dr. Horowitz worked for international bankers helping to spread fears about AIDS and bioterrorism for their global control agenda. That cost them memberships as many John Birchers immediately quit the organization. Soon after, the left wing liberals at The New Republic featured Dr. Horowitz as the leader of a misguided fringe anti-vaccination movement. Since then, scientific reports concerning vaccine injuries, deaths, and contaminations have brought these issues to light, and proven the doctor right. "In my more recent publications, Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse (Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 1999), Healing Celebrations (2000), and most recently, Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare (2001), I royally expose the international 'banksters'-the petrochemical-pharmaceutical industrialists-by publishing their secret codes, along with the low cost, low risk, highly effective natural healthcare and recovery solutions-methods these villains have been suppressing for decades," Dr. Horowitz said. It is certainly ironic that Mr. Kincaid, the director of a committee to "protect medical freedom," would demonize and obstruct a most loved and respected doctor who spends most of his time battling for health freedoms, and counseling patients to naturally preserve or recover their health. As his popularity and political notoriety increases, Dr. Horowitz expects other attacks, more sophisticated than Mr. Kincaid's, to come and go. That's just the nature of his work, and the behavior of a beast against which we all must do battle.             -end - NOTE TO JOURNALISTS: For an interview or article on this area of Dr. Horowitz's research, please call Contessa Morton at . Additional information in this regard is available on the doctor's website at http://www.tetrahedron.org. *********************** Mr. Kincaid's initial letter to Dr. Horowitz: *********************** Cliff Kincaid President, America's Survival, Inc. Director, Committee to Protect Medical Freedom P.O. Box 146 Owings, MD 20736 FAX Email: Kincaid August 19, 2001 To: Leonard G. Horowitz Author, Emerging Viruses VIA FAX and email My name is Cliff Kincaid, president of America's Survival, Inc., and director of the Committee to Protect Medical Freedom. I have your book, Emerging Viruses, which is heavily publicized and advertised on Joseph Farah 's WorldNetDaily, and one of your video tapes. Several weeks ago, I scheduled an interview with you on Chuck Harder's radio show while I was the substitute host. Your representative cancelled on the day of the show. So I thought I would present some of my questions in writing.  In a news release dated July 8 from your publishing group, it is stated that your new book, Death in the Air, includes information about the "intentional targeting of black Americans and Africans for population control, including depopulation, as is being accomplished by the AIDS epidemic today." The release cites the "secretly dispatched National Security Memorandum 46 to cabinet chiefs only" from Zbigniew Brzezinski, national security adviser in the Carter Administration. The release says, "This document, the most telling, authorized the FBI and CIA to initiative genocidal policies." I regret to report that it appears you have been snared in a web of disinformation. And it's a very old web that dates back almost two decades. This document was reproduced in "Soviet Active Measures. Hearings before the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, House of Representatives, Ninety-Seventh Congress, Second Session, July 13, 14, 1982." These 1982 hearings produced evidence that the document was a forgery, possibly of Soviet origin, designed to hurt U.S. relations with Africa. An analysis showed that one of the individuals involving in its distribution was a former member of the Communist Party USA who became affiliated with the World Peace Council, a Soviet front. This document is an obvious hoax. It includes no reference to genocide. Rather, it outlines a bogus government effort to monitor and provoke blacks at home and abroad. There was an authentic Presidential Review Memorandum 46, but it concerned events in Central America. This is confirmed by the Federation of American Scientists, a left-leaning group, on its Web site, in a listing of Carter presidential National Security Council documents. I can only assume that you were unaware that this document had been exposed as a forgery. So will you now disavow the document and either withdraw copies of your book or distribute a correction to be included with it? I also suggest you use this opportunity to engage in a crash course on how Soviet "active measures" and propaganda activities during the Cold War had an influence on Americans. I regret to report, however, that you are many years behind in understanding the Soviet KGB disinformation campaign. Since you proclaim intellectual curiosity and honesty, I expect you will admit your mistake and get to the bottom of how you were apparently tricked and deceived. The questions that should be answered include: Where did the document come from?  How was it presented to you? If we can get to the bottom of this, another chapter on "active measures" can be written. You are the one to write it. But even more serious is the claim advanced in your book that AIDS was manufactured by the United States. CBS Evening News anchor Dan Rather reported this charge on a March 30, 1987, broadcast and was widely criticized for playing into a Soviet KGB disinformation campaign. It had appeared in a number of Soviet and Third World publications before Rather picked it up. But you go much further than Rather, suggesting the charge is backed up by "evidence." In your book, Emerging Viruses, page 363, you write that, "For years preceding the end of the Cold War, the KGB gathered evidence, that Russian officials ultimately reported, suggesting an American origin of AIDS. Officials alleged that the AIDS virus had been a Pentagon invention - a germ unleashed for political purposes in Zaire." You go on to say that one Soviet official was continuing to make this charge in 1988, after Soviet officials admitted it was false. Do you really believe that the Soviet KGB was in the business of gathering legitimate "evidence" against the U.S.? They didn't "report" any such evidence. They planted charges in a propaganda operation designed to conceal the hand of the KGB. This is the nature of an "active measures" campaign. The Soviets were very busy fabricating U.S. Government documents. A report on this matter is Soviet Influence Activities: A Report on Active Measures and Propaganda, 1986-87, published in August 1987 by the U.S. Department of State. The published hearings of the House Intelligence Committee are also very useful. Ironically, your book (page 364) reproduces a Soviet Pravda cartoon depicting the "American origin" of the AIDS virus. You give "courtesy" credit to Covert Action Information Bulletin. In fact, you cite individuals associated with Covert Action Information Bulletin as legitimate sources of information on this topic. Yet this publication, according to 1980 hearings of the House Intelligence Committee, published a Soviet forgery of a NATO document as if it were authentic. Covert Action Information Bulletin was associated with Philip Agee, the CIA defector who collaborated with the Cuban Communists. You dismiss the fact that the AIDS charge against the Pentagon was disavowed in late 1987 by then Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev, who said, "No more lying. No More disinformation," in an effort at a moreforeign policy. But other officials also disavowed the campaign. Your book carries a publication date of 1996. · Four years before, in 1992, Yevgeni Primakov, former head of the KGB, admitted that "the KGB planted stories in the late 1980s which alleged that the HIV virus was the result of a Pentagon experiment." · In 1992, two former officers of the East German intelligence service, the Stasi, published a book in which they described how they collaborated with the KGB to promote the AIDS disinformation, using Russian-born East German professor Dr. Jakob Segal. This is mentioned in John O. Koehler's 1999 book, Stasi: The Untold Story of the East German Secret Police. · Former KGB officer Oleg Gordievsky admits the Soviet KGB role in spreading the AIDS charge against the U.S. in his 1990 book, The KGB - The Inside Story. Gordievsky calls the charge a "fabrication" that "also took in some of the Western media." · The leading Soviet AIDS expert, Viktor M. Zhdanov, repudiated the charge. Were you aware of any of these books, which were published years before Emerging Viruses came out? You note in your book that the CIA countered the Soviet disinformation but did you realize that several former Soviet or KGB officials had admitted it was a hoax? In your book, page 105, you note an accusation that Segal was "probably supplied information by the KGB," but you don't pursue it. Why? Have you ever had any direct contacts with Soviet/Russian officials on this topic? History shows that the Soviet AIDS campaign against the Pentagon was designed to distract attention from its own biological weapons program, which included the use of "yellow rain" due to Soviet germ warfare. Ken Alibek, deputy chief of the main Soviet biological weapons laboratory, discloses in his book, Biohazard, that the Soviets had explored AIDS as a weapon but concluded it was too unstable for use. However, he says they did add smallpox to their arsenal. The Soviets tried to cover-up a 1979 biological weapons disaster at their own Army biological research facility at Sverdlovsk, blaming the deaths on tainted meat. Are you troubled by the fact that the Soviets were able to deflect attention from the Sverdlosk incident for more than a decade by "active measures" or disinformation programs from the KGB?  In his comprehensive book on the origin of AIDS, The River, Edward Hooper, asserts that Segal's theory about AIDS can be dismissed, in part, because Soviet official Primakov, the former KGB chief, admitted the story had been planted (see page 154 of Hooper's book). However, Hooper discusses the possibility of a laboratory origin of AIDS. (page 155). Hooper nevertheless concludes that "The biological weapon hypothesis is so vague, and so unsupported by historical evidence about the nature of the rumored lethal agents (or even the location of the alleged base in the Congo), that it is difficult to counter. Unless, that is, one wishes to cite the HIV-positive 1959 blood sample from Leopoldville." If Hooper, a recognized authority and researcher, ultimately dismisses the Soviet version of how AIDS originated in his 1999 book, why won't you? You cite the bogus Brzezinski report as a "compelling" document that proves the U.S. Government has an "intentional" policy to kill blacks. The charge that AIDS is a plot against blacks also continues to inflame race relations in the U.S. Louis Farrakhan's newspaper, The Final Call, quotes you as saying AIDS is a "genocidal plot" against blacks ). The paper's on-line version carries a link to your Web site. Is this your official position? Do you collaborate with the Nation of Islam? Farrakhan is a close associate of anti-American terrorist leader Moammar Gadhafi of Libya. Gadhafi (Kadafi) has recently been resurrecting the charge that the U.S. (in this case the CIA) manufactured the AIDS virus. Here is one such story about his accusations: Kadafi Accuses CIA of Spreading Aids Virus Panafrican News Agency (Dakar) April 28, 2001 Abuja, Nigeria The Libyan revolutionary leader, Col. Moammar Kadhafi Friday accused the US Central Intelligence Agency or CIA of being responsible for the spread of HIV/AIDS throughout the world. "The issue today, which no one dares address, is the origin of the virus; namely who created HIV/AIDS. The door is totally closed. Even experts and doctors present here in Abuja have not addressed that ticklish and very hot issue," Kadhafi observed. According to him, "CIA laboratories had lost control over the virus which was tested on black Haitian prisoners. And it's not Kadhafi who says so, but this is a truth divulged by scientists." He refuted "the notion" according to which the disease was caused by monkeys from Africa as utterly false and baseless". "Our monkeys have always lived with us while the disease only emerged in the last two decades. It's a recent disease that dates back to the 1980s". To support his revelations, Kadhafi disclosed how health personnel contaminated 400 Libyan children with HIV/AIDS in the paediatrics ward of the Benghazi University Teaching Hospital (1,050km east of Tripoli). "The defendants - one doctor and five nurses - admitted that they were separately requested by the CIA and MOSSAD (the Israeli intelligence service) to contaminate Libyan children", Kadhafi explained to the astonishment of the summiteers. (30) Do you put any credibility in what Gadhafi has to say?  In an interview with Geoff Metcalf of WorldNetDaily, he mentions to you that the Bush Administration refused to sign a protocol to the U.N.'s germ weapons treaty and adds, "Hey, connect the dots." You respond: "Well, they are using and deploying biological weapons all over the place." You claim "about half the United States population" currently has a "upper-respiratory infection that won't quit" because of a "targeted weapon" unleashed by the U.S. Government to wreak havoc with "people's immune systems." Who exactly in the Bush Administration is aware of this alleged scheme?  Who developed this weapon?  Why does the Bush Administration want to make half of the U.S. population sick? Isn't it a fact that the Soviets/Russians have consistently violated the1972 Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention, supposedly banning such weapons? Ken Alibek devotes much of his book Biohazard to documenting how the Soviets violated the treaty. Citing Alibek and other Soviet defectors, the New York Times reported, "Almost immediately [after signing the 1972 treaty], Soviet defectors say, Moscow secretly redoubled its germ research and production." The Times cited reports that such research is continuing today. Alibek reveals that Gorbachev ordered a vast expansion of the germ weapons program even while posturing as a friend of the West. In the same interview with Metcalf, you contend that Congressmen Dan Burton and Ron Paul are ignoring your allegations or not taking you seriously enough. Do you believe they are part of the conspiracy and cover-up? You praise former Senator Don Riegle for conducting hearings into Gulf War Syndrome that turned up "valuable information." His report cited information that the Soviets were producing a germ warfare weapon called Novichok, leading to physical and health problems of the kind afflicting our Gulf war veterans, and that this agent may have been supplied by the Soviet Union to Iraq. If you have examined this, please let me know where your findings and analysis have appeared. Regarding the matter of contaminated polio vaccines, a legitimate area of inquiry and concern, you contend these health problems are intentional and man-made. But isn't it a fact that most of the early polio researchers gave those vaccines to their own kids? The early polio vaccine makers/researchers are certainly negligent for not looking for monkey viruses and not making sure they couldn't harm people once they found them in the vaccines. But isn 't this an error of arrogance, callousness and carelessness rather than intentional evil? Thank you for your attention to these matters.   *********************** Dr. Horowitz's response to Mr. Kincaid's initial letter: *********************** Clifford Kincaid President, America's Survival, Inc. Director, Committee to Protect Medical Freedom P. O. box 146 Owings, MD 20736    Dear Cliff,  Thank you for your fascinating and challenging letter of August 19, 2001 in  which you raise several questions concerning the legitimacy of my  documentation, research, conclusions, and political orientation. I most  appreciatedialogue with you concerning these matters, since they are,  indeed, vital to the survival of this great nation and all Americans.   First, again, I must apologize for the last minute cancellation of our radio  interview. I was simply unable to squeeze it in while I was returning with  my family from a work/vacation in Salt Lake City.  Now to the meat of the discussion:  You raise new information for me concerning the legitimacy of National  Security Memorandum 46, which as you suggest, I was not aware of the  evidence that suggests it was a Russian hoax. For this, in the third  printing of the book, Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic  Warfare (Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 2001), I will add this note, but I do  have a problem with this supposition. That is, everything that the  memorandum states, Russian hoax or not, came to pass since its 1978 alleged  publication/circulation. How could this have happened if this was a Russian  originated document, unless they had great intelligence or a crystal ball?  In essence, the document, then, regardless of its American or Russian  origin, is contextually accurate, and it is this accuracy to which I would  like to address discussions. Please consider first, how I think and how I draw my concerns and my  conclusions. I try to review everything that comes my way, and dig up more  in areas of interest dealing with every side of every issue. I feel that  this is only fair. Next, I ask you to appreciate my bias. That is, I no  longer see social/political or even cultural realities like I once did as a  left wing liberal from Boston. I now see, as I hope you might, a global  menace operating behind the scenes influencing every major government and  their intelligence organizations. Therefore, I need to filter through  propaganda considering its utility to the source, regardless of whether it  is communist, capitalist, socialist, etc.  As you may know, there is an intelligence/propaganda technique called  "blowback" that involves planting false stories in foreign countries and  then publicizing them as true in native countries. Your evidence concerning  NSM-46 may be a twist on this technique. That may best explain the fact that  the outcomes are consistent with American history. Much like the Report From  Iron Mountain that was first legitimately published by Dial Press, then  disqualified by government officials as a satirical hoax; or even the  Protocols of the Elders of Sion, which leaked out as a Masonic document and  then through the years was altered and demonized in various ways, and used  mostly against the Jewish people, I postulate the same may be true with  NSM-46. Again, I would prefer to offer this opinion based on the past twenty  years of decay within the Black community. Just as with the documents  mentioned above, all the recommendations made in NSM-46, seem to fit too  precisely to today's reality, to be simply labeled bogus and dismissed.  I will, however, advance your concerns in the third printing of my book  scheduled for the winter of 2002, if not before. In fact, if you don't mind,  I may quote you directly in this regard. Okay?  Regarding the source of this document, I received my copy of the alleged  NSM-46 from Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.--an attorney who is suing the federal  government for an apology on behalf of AIDS victims like himself. This  document was faxed to me by his staff in support of their complaint that  HIV/AIDS was created during the "Special Virus Cancer Program" (SVCP) to  facilitate African, and African-American, genocide. Mr. Graves believes, as  I do, the virus was deployed, most likely through contaminated vaccines, as  I advanced based on my independent investigation. My research and  conclusions were not based on the works of my predecessors, including Drs.  Cantwell, Strecker, Segal, or Seale, who likewise advanced man-made  theories.  I am not aware that Dan Rather advanced what you say he said. Do you have  the transcript per chance? I'd love to see it. I'll pay for it, if it can be  ordered.  I sense in your writing that you are a staunch anti-communist, and though I  personally find the practical outcomes of communism appalling, I feel the  same way about fascism which I evidence is taking over America under the  direction of certain globalists directing multi-national corporations. In my  writings, I'm not un-American, as you can read my favor of patriotism, but I  am extremely concerned about the degeneration of American social and  political systems, linked by numerous experts to intelligence organizations  and high-level officials that are advancing totalitarian policies. So when  you ask me, "Do you really believe that the Soviet KGB was in the business  of gathering legitimate 'evidence' against the U.S.?" The same may be asked  of the CIA regarding all the legitimate questions and concerns you raise.  Again, in my humble opinion, the reason that both sides cannot be trusted,  is that both sides are infiltrated by devil doers paid to foment unrest for  political, military, and ultimately economic gains by a select few.  I'd be very interested in reading the sections John O. Koehler wrote in 1999  concerning the 1992 allegations made by the Stasi regarding the KGB planting  the AIDS disinformation story. Again, however, we must consider the practice  of "blowback."  You mentioned several KGB officials that admitted the "fabrication." Indeed,  I am interested in their stories as well. However, we must remain aware that  KGB officials, like our own CIA officers, are "given information on a need  to know basis only." Thus, is it out of the question that these officials  might have thought they were giving true information that was really bogus,  or visa versa. This is, after all, how the Hegelian dialectic is effected,  which is the major way in which humanity has been put to sleep through  "cognitive dissonance." Consistently, such PSYOPS have succeeded  internationally.  Moreover, had these KGB officials been privy to the documentation that I  advanced in Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola-Nature, Accident or Intentional?  regarding Litton Bionetics and Dr. Gallo's activities during the SVCP, they  may have altered their admissions.  To reply directly to your question, no, I was not aware of these books or  statements prior to my publishing my thesis.  You asked several questions as though you may be suspicious of me for not  pursuing more details in this area of my investigation. You asked, "Have you  ever had any direct contacts with Soviet/Russian officials on this topic?"  My answer is, "No." My investigation involved three straight years of  library research conducted in six medical libraries and two public libraries  (New York and Boston). Had I researched in Russia, perhaps I would have  provided more, as you allege, communist propaganda!  Even Edward Hooper in his well-publicized and highly respected tome, The  River, neglected several important facts regarding this matter, including no  mention of my work whatsoever! So I suppose every author is guilty of some  amount of unintentional omission(s).  You professed twice that Ken Alibek is a legitimate ally of truth in this  field. As mentioned, my evidence argues the contrary. He is undoubtedly  working for the CIA, and thus, what he states in his book Biohazard, is  likely eighty-percent truth. As the Bible warns, "a half truth is a complete  lie." I found it interesting that the CIA (and CDC) drafted Alibek not long  after I exposed Larry Wayne Harris as a CIA counterintelligence  propagandist, and correctly predicted, six months in advance, his abuse as a  fall guy in their bioterrorism agenda. They brought Alibek in to facilitate  their PSYOPS required for this agenda to proceed as well. They did the same  with Richard Preston a few years earlier.  To put this issue to rest for those who have "eyes to see" truth, in my  latest book, Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare, I  published the National Cancer Institute (NCI), SVCP progress report from  1978 that shows during the cold war, Dr. Gallo and others were traveling to  Moscow to deliver the most advanced biotechnology capabilities and viral  recombinants, including HIV-like cancer viruses, to the communists for their  use. So if it is true that the Russians were far more advanced than the  Americans in this type of research and biological weapons development, as  the CIA, Richard Preston, and Dr. Ken Alibek claims, and you apparently wish  to believe, then how come this document shows our top researchers bringing  the Russians our most advanced biotechnologies, even during the cold war.  The only explanation is, as I mentioned, there are shadow governors pulling  the stings on both sides of every political spectrum.  I detailed why I don't accept Hooper's simple dismissal of the American lab  origin of HIV in the May, 2001 issue of the esteemed scientific journal of  Medical Hypothesis, published Harcourt Brace in England. Their peer  reviewers asked the same question, and I put my response to writing there.  In a nut shell, Hooper's thesis neglected: 1) the entire SVCP, 2) the 1974  hepatitis B vaccine trial involving gay men in NYC and Blacks in central  Africa, 3) Litton Bionetics's contract that I've reprinted showing that U.S.  taxpayers paid $2.153 million annually during the early 1970s for the  creation of the never-before seen immunosuppressive  leukemia-lymphoma-sarcoma cancer viruses that they manufactured using crude,  tedious, and risky laboratory methods that predated modern gene cloning and  splicing biotechnologies, and 4) Litton Bionetics's contract showing they  were the primary suppliers of monkeys and chimpanzees for this research and  development, and that they shipped contaminated chimpanzees to Dr. Maurice  Hilleman, at the Merck pharmaceutical company, that he used to produce, with  assistance from the CDC, FDA and NIAID, 200,000 human doses of the 1974-75  hepatitis B vaccine that according to all the scientific evidence,  (including the 1959 blood sample from the Leopoldville study), was the  vaccine that triggered the international AIDS pandemic.  Read the scientific paper Dr. David Ho et al., wrote regarding the 1959  blood specimen, not what the media or other authors say about that primary  research. You will find, as is frequently the case, the spin doctors in  mainstream media altered the findings of the scientific paper to fit a  political agenda.  My staff will be happy to forward a copy of my scientific report for your  perusal, but I believe it is downloadable from our archive files.  I am happy to learn that the Nation of Islam's, The Final Call, a newspaper  that issues Louis Farrakhan's concerns regarding HIV/AIDS as genocide, has a  direct link to our website. I applaud Minister Farrakhan, and a half dozen  other Black leaders, who have grasped the truth about HIV/AIDS as a  utilitarian population control plot, and have the guts to say it. You ask  suspiciously, and perhaps a little prejudicial, "Do you collaborate with the  Nation of Islam?"  My answer is, "Yes." At every opportunity, I collaborate with any nation,  people, and organization to help warn people about what I believe are urgent  risks to civilization, and ways to prevent and treat such risks. If you, or  anyone else, wish to condemn me for this, than so be it. You can condemn me  for fostering a relationship of mutual understanding and interracial  dialogue with Minister Farrakhan, just as John F. Kennedy Jr. did in his  last interview published in George magazine bringing Minister Farrakhan and  George McGovern together regarding strained black-white relations.  Regarding my take on Gadhafi, I've never met him, never spoke with him, nor  been in communication with him or his staff, though I would not hesitate to  do so, under the terms I expressed above. I am aware that he, like every  other politician, communicates with a bias inclined to express his agendas.  In this case, as you mention, my work seems to support his agenda against  the U.S.  Regarding my statements in response to Geoff Metcalf's comments, obviously  you have not read my more recent books, either Healing Codes for the  Biological Apocalypse, or Death in the Air. In both, your questions are  answered. James Baker III-the president's choice to oversee the Florida vote  scam, and George H.W. Bush, the president's father, have both been linked to  Tanox Biomedical Systems of Houston, TX and their Mycoplasma experiments in  Huntsville Prison with Baylor College of Medicine. Mycoplasma is the most  important modern pathogen that I write about. It is a primary co-factor in  AIDS, Gulf-War Syndrome, and persistent upper respiratory infections that  have become pandemic over the past few years, in case you haven't noticed.  The Bush Administration doesn't "want to make half of the U.S. population  sick," as you question. The Rockefeller-directed population councils have  published their desire to reduce the U.S. population by half. What better  way is there to accomplish this than to contaminate people, then enslave  them with the use of expensive pharmaceuticals?  Regarding your note concerning Alibek and Gorbachev, you contend it is  believable that Gorbachev correctly issued a retraction concerning the  Pentagon's link to HIV/AIDS, but here you admit he was "posturing as a  friend of the West." You can't have it both ways UNLESS you integrate the  globalists' cryptocracy, and the oligarchy, which you either haven't done  for lacking knowledge, or for political reasons. Which is it?  "As you sow, so shall you reap." You're asking me politically sensitive  questions. How about you answering some? What is your political  investment/bias in your questioning of me? For someone who alleges to have  read and digested many books that deal with this subject, including my book,  Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola, and obviously filtered out my American  patriotism, solid documentation, and scientifically valid thesis, while at  the same time raising the spectre of misplaced communist sympathies, I have  a few questions for you. Have you ever worked for the U.S. Federal  Government insofar as Russian intelligence is concerned? Have you ever  worked for the CIA, NSA, or other organizations that may be functioning in  support of covert operations or agendas?  Getting back to your questions, I look upon Congressmen like Dan Burton, Ron  Paul and Congresswoman Maxine Waters with the same due respect I give the  three monkeys that portray "see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil."  My work is simply dangerous to their political careers and pharmaceutical  industry PAC contributions. In this respect, they are indeed, part of a  "conspiracy of silence," at minimum.  In fact, you are either part of the solution, or part of the problem. Which  side are you, and these people on?  I have not examined the issue of Novichok in Don Riegle's extensive report,  but it does not surprise me. The Soviets are as capable as the Americans in  advancing biological warfare.  Regarding the provision of contaminated polio vaccines by early  investigators to their own children, with devastating and often lethal  consequences, it just goes to show how gullible and misinformed esteemed men  of medicine can be. I agree with you, given what I have written on this  subject. I often reference Christopher Simpson's excellent work, The Science  of Coercion. These men, haughty scientists most commonly committed errors  of, as you put it, "arrogance, callousness and carelessness rather than  intentional evil."  You are quite welcome, and thank you for advancing several critical  questions in this important regard. I just wish more people in leadership  positions would take the time to research critical questions, and act on  correct knowledge, instead of bypassing hot waters to stay politically  afloat.  With your permission, I would like to post your correspondence and this  reply on our website at http://www.tetrahedron.org . All right?  My best wishes for you in your efforts to research, learn, and tell the  truth.  I look forward to receiving your correspondence, and permission to post,  and/or publish, these communiqués.  Sincerely yours in the Spirit of Health,  Leonard G. Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H. President/Publisher, Tetrahedron Publishing Group   *********************** Mr. Kincaid's second letter to Dr. Horowitz: *********************** Dear Leonard Horowitz: thank you for responding. I will be preparing an answer myself and when that is ready and available, I will have absolutely no objection to reprinting any of this correspondence. Indeed, I plan on doing so as well. Dr. Horowitz's reply:  Great Cliff,  I look forward to getting your reply.  Thanks,  Len   *********************** Mr. Kincaid's third mailing to Dr. Horowitz: *********************** To: Leonard G. Horowitz Author, Emerging Viruses It is a step forward that you admit being taken in by an almost 20-year-old hoax and forgery. This admission may greatly undermine your credibility, but it has to be done in the name of accuracy and objectivity. However. the rest of your response to my detailed examination of the flimsy basis of your charges indicates that you are on the road to being totally discredited if you persist in defending sloppy research and wild and unsubstantiated charges. It is not too late for you to reverse course and pursue an approach of complete honesty and integrity. If you do not, those associated with you, such as Joseph Farah and your other cheerleaders at WorldNetDaily, will suffer a credibility breakdown, too. It is, unfortunately, guilt by association. So I expect that WorldNetDaily will do the right thing and come clean. You - and they -- owe the people the truth. You have a moral obligation to set the record straight. You say you got the bogus Brzezinski document and simply reported it. Do you accept as legitimate anything that simply looks authentic? Is this your standard of proof? If so, why should anything you report be accepted as valid? I can only assume you didn't even bother to do an Internet search about the document or find out if the subject matter appeared on a public list of National Security Council documents from the Carter Administration. As if this isn't bad enough, you attempt to defend your use of this forgery by saying it was "accurate." You have compounded one error with another. How do you know that? Where's the evidence for that charge? What evidence do you have that the CIA and FBI operations described in the document were actually carried out? You are simply making wild charges and assumptions again. You have no sources, except yourself. You had claimed the document authorized the FBI and CIA to initiate genocidal policies. The document includes no reference to genocide. So what are you talking about? Did you really expect people to read the release and not check and see if that is in the actual document? Then, on top of this misrepresentation, the document turns out to be a forgery. You say you were once a "left wing liberal from Boston." I see no reason to believe this has changed. Your book, Emerging Viruses, cites left-wing sources, including CIA defector Philip Agee's Covert Action Information Bulletin and even the Soviet KGB! Let me reemphasize that you report that ".the KGB gathered evidence suggesting an American origin of AIDS." How do you know this to be true? You say you never had any direct contacts with Soviet/Russian officials. The statement suggests you checked with the KGB. It's an old story by now: the KGB spread AIDS disinformation against the U.S. This is not even in dispute anymore, except by you - and you continue to insist somehow that the KGB's "evidence," whatever that may be, was valid. Dan Rather of CBS News got snared in this, too (you can check the AIM Web site www.aim.org for many articles about this). But this was back in 1987! Your book was published nine years later, in 1996. I regret that I have had your book for several years but only recently bothered to examine it in detail. I was astounded. I thought the evidence I presented to you in my letter would cause you to come around to the truth. But except for admitting being duped by the bogus Brzezinski document, it appears my effort was in vain. You seem to think you can continue peddling misinformation or disinformation and no one else will notice. But the truth will eventually catch up with you. You are welcome to publish this exchange of correspondence, and I will do so as well. This cause - that of determining the truth about AIDS - is so important that your erroneous material cannot be dismissed. It must be addressed and debunked. I repeat: several former KGB or Soviet officials have admitted the AIDS charge against the U.S. Government was a hoax and fabrication. You admit you were completely unaware of the major books describing the nature of the Soviet intelligence service and its operations. What books did you read during your three years of research? But then you suggest these former Soviet or KGB officials are wrong! You even try to smear Ken Alibek and others as CIA agents, without providing any proof. So they were telling the truth when they lied, and they were lying when they told the truth! Amazing. So the accident at Sverdlosk really involved tainted meat? Is this what you really believe? On top of this, you suggest these KGB officials, including their former chief, were in the dark because they did not read your book! You have a very inflated view of yourself and your work. I don't know if I am supposed to take you seriously. Only you have the truth. How convenient. Again, if you could fall for a 20 year-old forgery, why should we (or they) believe anything you have to offer? Finally, when I ask for proof for your claim that the Bush Administration is using biological weapons on the American people, you refer to President Bush 's father and others "linked" to a medical facility. What does this have to do with answering my question and proving your charge? Your stated willingness to collaborate with Louis Farrakhan and Libya's Moammar Gadhafi speaks volumes. But do you really believe Gadhafi's charge that the Mossad and the CIA were behind the alleged infection of Libyan children with AIDS? If so, I will ask again what I have requested so many times - show me the proof. Your standards fall short of those of the liberal left-wing media. Frankly, this is a major embarrassment for you. And if you don't recognize it, I can only feel sorrow for your inability to face up to reality. Perhaps you have a lot invested in these claims. I'm sorry about that. But it's not too late to correct the record. You have a moral obligation to do so. As a journalist, media critic, researcher and author who has never been employed by or associated with any government intelligence agency (contrary to your unwarranted and paranoid insinuation), I believe that providing accurate information to the American people is a special responsibility. We should check our information. When we make errors, we should admit our mistakes. I have a degree in communication with an emphasis in journalism. I have written for many different publications, including The American Legion Magazine, the Washington Post, Human Events, The Washington Times, Insight magazine, and others. My group America's Survival, Inc. has been covered in the pages of Investor's Business Daily, USA Today, the Washington Times and other news organizations. My books include Michael New: Mercenary or American Soldier, (with Daniel New) about the case of the Army Soldier who refused to serve the U.N. My America's Survival, Inc. (www.usasurvival.org) has sponsored conferences opposing the U.N. agenda and corruption in and by government. We have published almost a dozen special reports on global issues. My June 20 conference through the Committee to Protect Medical Freedom, one of our special projects, challenged the government's AIDS vaccine program, its AIDS science, and the failure to address contaminated vaccines possibly linked to cancer and AIDS. I am proud to say that my credibility and reputation are first-rate. For 20 years I have been associated with Accuracy in Media, the nation's premier media watchdog group. I understand the need to verify information and ask the right questions. We have taken on the Big Media in this country. I even wrote an article for the Washington Post questioning Rush Limbaugh's credibility when he got his facts wrong and made misstatements. In my work at AIM, we have challenged government corruption and the lies of the government agencies such as the FBI and CIA on Vincent Foster, TWA 800, Waco and Oklahoma City. AIM has taken the Independent Counsel to court. You claim some academic or medical training, but your journalistic standards are woefully inadequate. The kinds of errors you have made would have gotten you kicked out of Journalism 101 in elementary school. However, common sense should have entered into the picture. You should have considered the other side of the story at some point. I hesitate to say that you are deliberately misleading people. However, your failure to come to grips with documented lapses and major errors in your writings suggests that you don't really care about the need to honestly inform the American people about the true state of affairs. So what does that say about your motivation? I do not question your patriotism, only your intelligence and judgment. If I am wrong in this, I hope and pray you can correct your errors and apologize promptly. Your innuendo that I am somehow a patsy of the government or its intelligence agencies is what I would expect from someone who realizes he is on shaky intellectual ground. This kind of innuendo is unbecoming and despicable. It suggests you are trying to deflect attention from the weakness of your arguments. Indeed, they are very weak, if not nonexistent.  As for me, I don't necessarily believe anything the government has to say. I am skeptical, even cynical, toward government. On the other hand, I believe America has (had) real enemies, and they are capable of spewing lies as well. Yes, I was and am an anti-communist. I make no apologies for that. My writings demonstrate consistent opposition to tyranny of any kind. I believe, however, that in affirming freedom, we should promote accountability, responsibility and truth. Tell the truth. Expose the lies. Prior to Dr. Horowitz being able to respond to the above, Mr. Kincaid sent the following posting over the Internet: Author Caught Promoting Soviet AIDS Disinformation in Book on "Emerging Viruses" Leonard Horowitz Duped on Forgery; Willing to Collaborate with Farrakhan, Gadhafi.     Author and speaker Leonard G. Horowitz, who claims AIDS was manufactured in a U.S. Government laboratory, has been caught promoting an old Soviet disinformation theme that has been disavowed by former Soviet and KGB officials. Horowitz's 1996 book, Emerging Viruses, which is still being heavily advertised and publicized on Joseph Farah's popular WorldNetDaily Internet news site, claims that the Pentagon manufactured AIDS. He even claims the Soviet KGB found "evidence" for the charge. But the charge was discredited years ago and the Soviets/Russians repudiated it. In his new book, Death in the Air, Horowitz cites a forgery, possibly of Soviet origin, of a National Security Council document from the Jimmy Carter years to argue that the U.S. has an intentional genocidal plan to kill blacks. Horowitz told Geoff Metcalf of WorldNetDaily that the Bush Administration has rejected a United Nations protocol to the germ warfare treaty because it is using biological weapons "all over the place" and that one of them has made half the U.S. population sick. No evidence for this preposterous charge was provided. Cliff Kincaid, president of America's Survival, Inc., and director of the Committee to Protect Medical Freedom, has sent a 6-page letter to Horowitz raising serious questions about his charges and asking him to retract or correct them. "The record shows that it was the Soviet Union/Russia which violated the germ weapons treaty and considered using AIDS as a weapon," Kincaid said. "The Soviets used the AIDS charge against the U.S. to divert attention from their own biological weapons program." See the full story, including the Horowitz response, at: http://www.protectmedicalfreedom.com/ck8222k1.shtml *********************** Dr. Horowitz's final letter to Mr. Kincaid: *********************** August 22, 2001   Clifford Kincaid President, America's Survival, Inc. Director, Committee to Protect Medical Freedom P. O. Box 146 Owings, MD 20736   Dear Mr. Kincaid, This is the final correspondence you will receive from me. Moreover, based on the manner in which you adeptly twist my words, meanings, and the truth, I no longer will engage in any dialogue with you, except before live audiences who will see and/or hear the differences between us, and fairly judge any credibility gaps in our respective presentations or positions. You claim to be a truth teller, and wish to engage in fair and discussions regarding critical issues, yet after my letter to you in which I replied to each and every question and point you raised, you failed to reply, in turn, or good faith, to my most important questions. Including here is your offensively biased oversight of the documentation and references that I published for bonafide scientific investigators and journalists in my book Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola. Your deliberate avoidance of these critical documents speaks volumes about the fact you are neither a scientist, or even a respectable journalist, but a fool with anti-communist flair, who apparently has captured the imaginations of even less intelligent and more biased individuals, including those in the mainstream media, (e.g., the Washington Post, USA Today, etc.) The manner in which you distorted my words, to suit your political agenda, regarding the alleged NSM-46 "forgery" is despicable, and apparently reflects either psychopathology (lunacy) or vengeance on your part. In either case, you make it clear by your accusations; you have no interest in fair, and productive dialogue. You claim that I have yet "a moral obligation to set the record straight . . . and owe the people the truth." Regarding the issue of AIDS and the production of HIV-like viruses by the U.S. Army's sixth top biological weapons contractor, Litton Bionetics, I set the record straight by reprinting their 1971 U.S. Government, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Project Report 8, contract number 2025 document. A topic you cleverly avoided. Yet, this document, as well as the others in this award winning text, speaks for itself, and elevates me above your contentious, abrasive, and manipulative dribble. I also "set the record straight" in Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse (Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 1999); by revealing 3,000 year old hidden Bible codes that people can now see without computer assistance. These codes expose the use of such sacred knowledge by the British Secret Service (MI6) and other global devil doers. Finally, in my latest work, Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare, I again, "set the record straight" by reprinting full color photographs that depict the ongoing global genocide and the culprits who are waging covert war on humanity. This work also fulfills Revelation 13:18 regarding the "666" "mark of the beast." Indeed, my works all speak for themselves with evidentiary documents reprinted. You'd have to be a complete fool to challenge my integrity as humanitarian and investigative journalist. And that is apparently what you are. You wrote, " I don't know if I am supposed to take you seriously." This statement alone exposes your lunacy in prose. Your charged letters show you obviously take me, and my work, very seriously. For the sake of your psychosocial rehabilitation, please do yourself (and me) a favor: assume you don't have to take me seriously, and leave me, and my colleagues alone! Sincerely yours, Leonard G. Horowitz, D.M.D., M.A., M.P.H. President/Publisher, Tetrahedron, Inc.